The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. That moment and the challenges that followed made up for a few hours of ho-hum puzzle solving.The Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. I won’t spoil it, but it the way it subverts expectations and marries the story and mechanics that had at that point become all too familiar is genuinely original and incredibly interesting. Instead of trigger those “aha!” moments that make a truly great puzzle game, it felt more like I was just going through the motions.But while the first two-thirds of The Turing Test definitely fell into the been-there-done-that realm, there’s a super smart twist in the later on that flips the whole thing on its head. This led to some pacing problems that had me sighing my way through a handful of puzzles. I far too often found myself figuring out a solution quickly, only to have to go through the chore-like series of moves to actually navigate myself through it. As they stand, challenges throughout most of The Turing Test are generally simplistic to mentally solve, but oftentimes devolve into mostly physically demanding tasks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |